Marie Weckerle vs Milena Ciocan Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 27 Oct at 11:52 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Weckerle vs M. Ciocan

LUX
1
Win
Played
0
Win

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Weckerle 1 - 0 Ciocan
They have played 2 sets in total, with Marie Weckerle winning 2 and Milena Ciocan winning 0. The last match between Marie Weckerle and Milena Ciocan was at the W35 Villeneuve d'Ascq, 27-10-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: I.hard, with Marie Weckerle getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Weckerle | 1 |
| Ciocan | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) W35 Villeneuve d'Ascq(10-27-25)
M. Weckerle vs M. Ciocan H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 54.70% (128-106) | Career Total W/L | 45.45% (20-24) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Weckerle vs M. Ciocan Match Preview:
- In the past six months, Marie Weckerle has marginally outperformed Milena Ciocan in winning second serve points, with percentages of 36.15% and 33.64% respectively. This statistic often correlates with successful match outcomes. Who has the upper hand here? It appears slightly in favor of Weckerle.
- Milena Ciocan shows a stronger return game against opponents' second serves, capturing 57.99% of points compared to Weckerle’s 53.66%. This advantage could play a crucial role in determining the match winner.
- Both players exhibit similar abilities in returning first serves, with Weckerle at 35.13% and Ciocan close behind at 34.57%, making this area less decisive in their match-up.
- In high-pressure scenarios, Milena Ciocan demonstrates superior breakpoint saving with a rate of 48.97%, surpassing Weckerle’s 42.99%. This could be a key factor in tight sets.
- Considering overall performance in the last year, Weckerle holds a narrow edge, winning 53.33% of her matches, while Ciocan has won 50.00%.
- Both players have their preferred surfaces; Weckerle excels on hard courts (57%), whereas Ciocan performs best on indoor hard courts (57%). Their match is likely contested on a surface favoring Weckerle.
- The caliber of opponents faced over the past year differs, with Ciocan competing against stronger (average rank 263.27) compared to Weckerle (average rank 402.12). Could this higher level of competition give Ciocan an edge?
- In terms of tournament level, Weckerle has faced stiffer competition at higher-tier events, while Ciocan has performed better in slightly lower-tier tournaments.
- If the match extends to a deciding set, Weckerle has a slight advantage, winning 47% of such sets in the past year, compared to Ciocan's 40% success rate.
Editorial Prediction (October 27, 2025, UTC):
In comparing Marie Weckerle and Milena Ciocan, both players bring distinct strengths to the court. Weckerle’s slight edge in second serve performance could tip the scales in her favor, as this often correlates with match success. Furthermore, her experience in deciding sets suggests she might handle close encounters more effectively.
While Ciocan’s superior return on second serves may challenge Weckerle, her relative inexperience in breaking down Weckerle's consistent defense under pressure could prove to be a hurdle.
Ultimately, when looking at the combination of performance trends, surface advantage, and competitive exposure, Marie Weckerle is slightly favored to win this match. However, the match is expected to be closely contested.
Marie Weckerle vs Milena Ciocan Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Weckerle vs M. Ciocan H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Weckerle Recent Matches Played
M. Ciocan Recent Matches Played

M. Weckerle vs M. Ciocan Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54.70% (128/106) | YTD Win/Loss | 45.45% (20/24) |
| 54.20% (284/240) | Sets Win/Loss | 45.74% (43/51) |
| 52.63% (2527/2274) | Games Win/Loss | 50.06% (440/439) |
| 57.06% (93/70) | Hard Win/Loss | 40.00% (2/3) |
| 52.00% (13/12) | Clay Win/Loss | 46.43% (13/15) |
| 47.83% (22/24) | Indoor Hard W/L | 45.45% (5/6) |
| 0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 221 | Aces Total | 33 |
| 0.42 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.39 |
| 991 | Total Double Faults | 166 |
| 1:17:42 | Average Match Time | 1:8:51 |
| 391.91 | Average Opponent Rank | 240.3 |
| 63% (7079/11282) | 1st Serve % | 61% (1282/2106) |
| 60% (4260/7079) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (769/1282) |
| 42% (1756/4203) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (345/824) |
| 49% (769/1570) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (123/264) |
| 48% (5590/11661) | Return Points Win % | 47% (951/2003) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 44.95% (49/60) | Challenger W/L | 35.71% (5/9) |
| 63.71% (79/45) | Futures W/L | 50.00% (15/15) |
| 55% (126/231) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 43% (18/42) |
| 54% (20/37) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 25% (1/4) |
| 48% (28/58) | Deciding Set Win % | 38% (3/8) |
| 84% (137/115) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (23/19) |
| 16% (137/22) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (23/4) |
| 12% (97/12) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 5% (21/1) |